vault backup: 2026-06-25 22:55:55
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
60070ef148
commit
2f7e8ce771
1 file changed
+3
-1
@@ -39,4 +39,6 @@ Since 3.3V are needed the values of 180K and 1M will be used for the feedback vo
|
|||||||
Figure 31 in section 10.2 of the datasheet should be used as an example layout for the regulator
|
Figure 31 in section 10.2 of the datasheet should be used as an example layout for the regulator
|
||||||
## PCM5102A
|
## PCM5102A
|
||||||
## LCD Selection
|
## LCD Selection
|
||||||
Initially I was planning to use the [NHD-2.4-240320DA-CTXN](https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/newhaven-display-intl/NHD-2-4-240320DA-CTXN/26743729) but I found that it requires 9.0V to drive the back light. Since I am driving this off of a single cell lipo I didn't want to add the additional complexity of another boost converter to get to 9.0V. I was able to find
|
Initially I was planning to use the [NHD-2.4-240320DA-CTXN](https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/newhaven-display-intl/NHD-2-4-240320DA-CTXN/26743729) but I found that it requires 9.0V to drive the back light. Since I am driving this off of a single cell lipo I didn't want to add the additional complexity of another boost converter to get to 9.0V. I was able to find [another very similar display](https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/newhaven-display-intl/NHD-2-4-240320AF-CSXP/22204988) that instead uses 3.0V (up to 3.3V) to power the back light.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The display controller gives the option of using SPI or parallel RGB to control the display. I decided to go with SPI since it is much simpler to route and manage and I don't need the performance gained by the parallel RGB interface.
|
||||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user